• 专利附录
  • 专利说明
  • 权利要求
  • 类似技术
  • 同族专利
  • 引用文献
  • 法律状态
  • 优先权
    • 专利摘要:
    Method for determining a setpoint for a setting parameter in a casting process. wherein casting material in a fluid phase is filled at least once under pressure into a mold cavity (4) formed by two mold halves, a closing force being applied to the mold halves during filling of the mold cavity (4), at least one characteristic of a size characteristic of the closing force is measured, a relationship between the measured course or a derived from the measured curve size on the one hand and a parameter of the casting process on the other hand is determined and the setpoint for the adjustment parameter is determined from the context.
    公开号:AT514847A1
    申请号:T757/2013
    申请日:2013-09-30
    公开日:2015-04-15
    发明作者:Josef Dipl Ing Giessauf；Georg Dipl Ing Dr Pillwein
    申请人:Engel Austria Gmbh；
    IPC主号:
    专利说明:

    The present invention relates to a method for determining a desired value for a setting parameter in a casting process according to the preamble of claim 1 and to a shaping machine having the features of the preamble of claim 27.
    Under a forming machine is any machine to understand, which is suitable to fill casting material in a fluid phase under pressure in a mold cavity. In particular, these are injection molding machines, die casting machines, transfer molding and the like.
    The state of the art in an injection molding process will be described below, the problems also being transferable to other casting processes.
    When injecting casting material into a mold cavity, for example, a screw or a piston is moved in the direction of the mold cavity. The setpoint specification for this movement can be a velocity profile over the path or time, a pressure profile over the path or time, or a path profile over the tent. In practice, it is customary to use combinations of different phases with different specifications in succession.
    The implementation of initially a speed-controlled injection phase with a subsequent pressure-controlled phase (holding pressure phase) has become particularly established. The holding pressure phase is followed by a cooling phase (cooling time) in which the molded part is cooled to a temperature suitable for demolding.
    In these three phases of the injection molding process, the properties of the injection molded part produced are essentially determined. The effective setting variables during these phases as well as the duration of these phases is thus of special technical importance. Examples of essential parameters in these three phases are:
    Injection phase: Injection velocity profile and changeover point Hold-down phase: Hold-down profile and hold-up time Cooling phase: Mold temperature and cooling time
    The transition from the injection phase to the holding pressure phase can take place when a certain position, pressure or time has elapsed. This transition is also referred to below as the switching point.
    The transition from the holding pressure phase to the cooling phase and the end of the cooling phase are usually controlled time-dependent.
    The transition (switching) of the speed-controlled injection phase to the pressure-controlled pressure phase is usually dependent on a certain size exceeding or falling short of a threshold. In practice, for example, screw position, injection pressure, injection time or in-mold pressure are frequently used as switching criterion, ideally an attempt is made to to select the switching point so that at the switching time substantially a volumetric filling of the cavity is ensured. The speed-controlled injection phase is then used mainly for mold filling while the subsequent pressure-controlled holding pressure phase mainly serves for shrinkage compensation. If the changeover occurs too early, the cavity will be completely filled only in the following pressure-controlled holding pressure phase, which may make the process very susceptible to fluctuations in the material viscosity. In addition, it can come after switching to a significant drop in the injection pressure when the mold is not completely filled. On the other hand, if the changeover is too late, this can lead to overfilling of the cavity and, as a consequence, to a strong increase in pressure, overspray, burr formation, increased tool wear and other negative effects. A non-optimal setting of the switching point thus has numerous negative consequences that stand in the way of stable production.
    However, the optimal setting of the switching point is not necessarily easy to accomplish in practice. Often one manages a so-called filling study in which the injection process in the speed-controlled injection phase is terminated prematurely at different times and the degree of filling of the produced parts is examined. Based on the partially filled parts of the supposed optimal switching point is then determined. This is not only time consuming but also does not always guarantee the desired result. Even if the injection process at the switching point is completed, it takes a certain time until the injection pressure is completely reduced. During this period, additional material is transported into the cavity. So it is not readily possible to read the exact filling state at the switching time on the finished part.
    With regard to the injection speed, similar problems exist. At high injection speeds, the injection pressure increases sharply due to the increased volume flow, while the pressure increases at low injection speeds due to the cooling of the melt during the injection process.
    The holding pressure and the holding pressure time are also essential. In this phase, the shrinkage caused by the cooling of the molded part is compensated for and the dimensions of the finished molded part substantially co-determined. The reprinting time should be as high as possible compared to the so-called sealing tent. The sealing time is the time from which the gate of the part is frozen so far that no material transport into the mold cavity is possible. If the holding pressure level is too low or the holding time too short, this can lead to sink marks or cavities on the molded part due to the lack of compensation for shrinkage. If holding pressure and / or holding pressure are set too high, the process is economical and energetic not optimal anymore. The classical method for determining the minimum or optimal hold-up time involves a systematic variation of the hold-up time and a weight measurement of the parts produced, and is thus again relatively time-consuming.
    The cooling phase is decisive for the contour accuracy and the distortion of the molded parts, too short a cooling time reduces the contour accuracy of the molding surface or can lead to increased distortion. If the cooling time is longer than required, this reduces productivity and increases energy consumption. Ideally, the internal mold pressure should decrease at least approximately to ambient pressure at the end of the cooling time.
    If, in addition, holding time and / or holding pressure height are set too low, it may happen that the molded part loses contact with the tool wall during the cooling time due to the shrinkage and so no longer any good heat transfer is possible. This reduces the effectiveness of the cooling and unnecessarily increases the required cooling time.
    In general, therefore, finding suitable values for adjustment parameters in a casting process is difficult and time consuming.
    The object of the invention is therefore to provide a method which enables a simplified determination of desired values for setting parameters of a casting process. Furthermore, a shaping machine for carrying out such a method is to be provided.
    This object is achieved by a method having the features of claim 1 and a shaping machine having the features of claim 27.
    This is done by measuring at least one course of a variable characteristic of the closing force, determining a relationship between the measured curve or a variable derived from the measured curve on the one hand and a parameter of the casting process on the other hand, and determining the setpoint value for the setting parameter from the context ,
    In most cases, the closing force is measured relatively directly as the hydraulic pressure of a lock cylinder or as the force exerted by a closing electric drive on a platen. However, it is also conceivable to measure, for example, deformations on the closing unit or a forming tool, which are characteristic of the closing force. The resulting characteristic of a characteristic of the closing force size must then not be converted into the closing force itself for the purposes of the invention, but can be used directly to determine the relationship.
    However, in the following, for the sake of simplicity and concreteness, reference will be made to the measurement of the closing force and the closing force curve, it being always understood by those skilled in the art that a measurement of a characteristic size of the closing force, for example, in a known functional relationship to the closing force, is the same Can serve purpose.
    As parameters of the casting process, any variables which characterize the casting process (for example, closing force) or sizes occurring during the casting process (for example, teat position) can be used.
    Based on measured values and sensor signals present on the machine (in particular the closing force), optimum values for relevant setting variables in the different phases of the casting process (in particular injection, postpressure and cooling phase) can be determined or the existing setting can be checked with the aid of an inventive method and the operator If necessary, appropriate instructions for an improvement in attitude are given.
    It is irrelevant to the invention whether the movement is controlled or regulated in the injection or repressurization phase. Likewise, it is irrelevant whether a screw, a piston, or another movable element, for example an embossing element in the injection mold, is used for introducing and distributing the melt in the mold cavity. The said profiles can in the simplest case consist only of a constant value.
    The desired value for a setting parameter determined according to the invention can be used in various ways. On the one hand, it can be automatically used by the machine as a setpoint for a controlled or controlled movement. On the other hand, he can also simply as a proposal for a
    Operator are displayed or it can be displayed a warning if the set value differs significantly from the invention determined setpoint.
    It should be noted that it is not absolutely necessary to establish a connection between the closing force curve and the respective setting parameter. In many cases, it may be advantageous to relate a variable derived from the closing force curve to the setting parameter. Examples of such quantities would be a tool breathing, a derivative of the closing force curve with time, a position or other independent size and the like.
    Furthermore, for example, a Fourier transformation for filtering out oscillations can be performed or a single point from the closing force curve (for example an extreme value) can be extracted.
    Further advantageous embodiments of the invention are defined in the dependent claims.
    A preferred embodiment of the invention may consist in using, as a connection, an assignment of a time parameter to the closing force curve or a variable derived from the closing force curve and an assignment of the time parameter to the parameter of the casting process. Since many parameters on forming machines are measured in any case as a function of time, this can represent a particularly simple implementation of the invention.
    A further preferred embodiment of the invention may consist in using, as a connection, an assignment of the setting parameter to the closing force curve or a variable derived from the closing force curve. In many cases, the relationship can be represented in this way very easily.
    The mentioned assignments can preferably be represented as curves or diagrams. (See the Figures.) In particular, if the determination of the setpoint for the adjustment parameter is automatic, this need not be the case
    Be a case. For this it is sufficient if the assignment is present within the machine control.
    In a further preferred embodiment of the invention, it may be provided that a threshold value or a target value for the measured progression or a variable derived from the measured profile is predetermined and determined via the relationship between the value of the parameter of the casting process corresponding to the threshold value or the target value and as desired value is determined for the setting parameter. When using a target value, it does not need to be exactly matched. Normally, reaching a range around the target value will be used as a condition.
    However, it can also be provided that a value of the parameter of the casting process, which corresponds to an extreme value of the measured curve or a variable derived from the measured curve, is determined via the relationship and determined as the desired value for the adjustment parameter. Depending on which setting parameter is to be optimized and whether the closing force or a variable derived therefrom is used, a suitable criterion can be selected, wherein preferably a generic form of the context to be examined is taken into account. For a particularly rapid optimization of the adjustment parameters, it can be provided that exactly one casting cycle, in which casting material is filled into the mold cavity, is carried out.
    In complex contexts or, if a particularly accurate setting of the setpoint values is required, it may be provided that a plurality of casting cycles, in which casting material is filled into the mold cavity, are carried out, the setting parameter being varied during the various casting cycles.
    Depending on the setting parameter for which a setpoint is to be found, a suitable parameter of the casting process which is subject to a variation (during a casting cycle or during several casting cycles) must be used.
    In some cases, the Einstedparameter itself can be used as a parameter, examples of which are: - an injection speed of an injection movement, - a head pressure, - a cylinder temperature of an injection cylinder, - a tool temperature, - a back pressure, - a screw speed and - hot runner temperatures.
    Examples of setting parameters that can be optimized by varying another parameter are: a switching point between a speed-controlled and a pressure-controlled phase of an injection movement, wherein a screw position can be used as a parameter, a sealing point and / or an end time of an injection movement, a hold time using a time parameter as a parameter, a closing force using a momentary closure force as a parameter, a cooling time using a time parameter as a parameter, and an injection pressure limit, wherein the injection pressure can be used as a parameter.
    Of course, it is also possible with the adjustment parameters, which can be determined by varying another parameter, to determine the desired value by varying the adjustment parameter itself. By determining the setpoint by means of another parameter, however, it can be achieved that only a single cycle has to be carried out, which can decisively shorten the setting of the casting process.
    In a preferred embodiment it can be provided that the setpoint value for the adjustment parameter is used in the regulation or control of a shaping machine, with the setpoint value being particularly preferably taken over automatically by the regulation or control device of the shaping machine performing the casting process.
    Further advantages and details of the invention are apparent from the figures and the associated description of the figures. Showing:
    1a and 1b fictitious, setting parameter related relationships to illustrate the basic principle of the invention,
    Fig. 2 different relationships for determining a
    switching point,
    Fig. 3 shows a connection to the determination of a
    Injection speed,
    Fig. 4a. 4b and 5 different closing force curves or
    Differential closing force curves of varying holding pressure time,
    6 shows a connection resulting from FIGS. 4 and 5 for determining a sealing point, and FIG. 7 shows an injection molding machine according to the invention with electrical
    Closing drive as well
    Fig. 8 shows an injection molding machine according to the invention with hydraulic
    Closing drive.
    FIG. 1 a shows a fictitious relationship between a variable S derived from the closing force curve and a parameter P, wherein both variables are shown as a function of the time t. In the present case, the criterion for the desired value E * of the setting parameter E is the time at which the quantity S derived from the closing force curve has a minimum value as the extreme value. This time is denoted by t *. This results in the setpoint value to be determined for the adjustment parameter E as E * = P *.
    FIG. 1 b shows a fictitious relationship between a variable S derived from the closing force curve and a parameter P, which in this case is the setting parameter E itself. The criterion for selecting the setpoint value E * for the setting parameter is the minimum value S *. The setpoint E * = P * for the setting parameter then results from this connection.
    In Figure 2a, the result of a series of experiments is shown, wherein at different switching times (parameterized by the Schneckenvorraumvolumen) the increase in force was observed at the switching time. A predefined threshold value (represented by a horizontal, dotted line) can be used to automatically define a vane pre-void volume, which can serve as the setpoint for the switching-over time. (In this case, the fourth measurement point coincidentally falls exactly to the limit.)
    One of the advantages of the invention is that the threshold can be selected at least for many casting processes only depending on the forming machine (not the forming tool), whereby a reliable setting of the casting process can be achieved without the operator having years of experience in this regard.
    FIG. 2b shows an alternative determination of the desired value. The upper diagram shows the closing force plotted against time. In the second diagram of Figure 2b, the screw position is plotted against time. By defining a threshold value for the closing force, a corresponding setpoint for the screw position can be found.
    The embodiments of FIGS. 2a and 2b differ in that a plurality of cycles have to be carried out in the former and only one cycle is required for the second. (Since the screw position can be converted into a volume of the screw antechamber due to the known geometry of the screw and of the injection cylinder, the nominal values determined by the two different methods according to the invention are equivalent.)
    In FIG. 3, a value derived from the closing force curve is a respiration value (that is, a deformation of the closing unit or the tool due to the injection pressure) as a function of an injection speed. The criterion for the desired value v * is the minimum of the curve.
    The calculation of the tool breathing from the closing force takes place with prior determination of an effective spring constant, which describes the deformation of the closing unit of the forming machine under closing force and injection pressure.
    Figures 4, 5 and 6 relate to a method for determining a sealing point. To illustrate the emergence of FIG. 5, FIGS. 4a and 4b show, on the one hand, two closing force curves and, on the other hand, the difference between the two closing force curves. The closing force curves differ in that they were operated with different holding times when they were created. How this difference is reflected in the closing force curve is clear in Figure 4b. Due to the slightly longer holding time, additional casting material is conveyed into the cavity, which increases the pressure in the cavity and consequently the closing force. Of course, a slight time shift between the maxima of the two closing force curves can be seen, which is also a result of the different length of holding pressure times.
    FIG. 5 shows several differential closing force profiles as shown in FIG. 4b. Casting cycles were carried out with holding times between 0.2 and 2.6 seconds, with time intervals of 0.2 seconds each being used. The curves are difference curves between clamping force curves, which are each characterized by 0.2 seconds of different holding pressure time.
    As can be seen, starting from a certain holding time, a uniform difference curve sets in, whereby only the maximum of the difference curves is shifted by the difference in the holding pressure time. It can be concluded from the time when the uniformity of the difference curves sets in, the
    Sealing point is reached. This is illustrated more clearly in FIG. 6, in which in each case the difference of the maxima-which in this case represents the rate of the pressure change-is plotted against the holding pressure time. The criterion used here is that the applied rate of pressure changes falls below a threshold value or substantially disappears.
    As can be seen from the context shown in Figure 6, a simple and accurate determination of the victory point can be achieved by a method according to the invention. In a further embodiment of the invention, it is provided to superimpose a varying pressure profile on the post-pressure profile by the plasticizing screw. This pressure profile is clearly visible before reaching the sealing point in the closing pressure curve. After reaching the sealing point, this is no longer the case, because the casting material is solidified in the sprue. In this way too, the sealing point can be determined.
    FIGS. 7 and 8 each show an injection molding machine 1 according to the invention with a closing unit 2 and an injection unit 3, wherein in the first case there is an electric closing drive and in the second case a hydraulic closing drive.
    In this exemplary embodiment, the injection unit 3 has a plasticizing screw 5 through which casting material-for example plasticized plastic-can be filled into a mold cavity 4. The thinnest point close to the mold cavity 4, at which first a hardening of the casting material takes place during filling, is called gate 9. To drive the plasticizing screw 5, the injection drive 6 is used.
    The aforementioned sensors and the injection drive are each connected to the control or regulating device 7.
    A worm travel sensor can be realized by a rotary encoder in the injection drive 6.
    Other sensors that can be used to measure parameters on the injection molding machine 1 include a hydraulic pressure sensor 12 (FIG. 8), a force sensor 13 (FIG. 7) for measuring a closing force exerted by an electrically executed closing drive, an in-mold pressure sensor 10, a pressure sensor 11 near the gate 9 and an injection pressure sensor 8.
    The force sensor 13 may be designed as a strain gauge or as a torque sensor in the drive.
    Innsbruck, September 30, 2013
    权利要求:
    Claims (27)
    [1]
    Claims 1. A method of determining a target value for a setting parameter in a casting process wherein casting material in a fluid phase is filled under pressure into a mold cavity (4) formed by two mold halves at least once, with a closing force on the mold halves during filling of the mold cavity (4) is exercised, characterized in that at least one course of a characteristic of the closing force size is measured, a relationship between the measured course or derived from the measured course size on the one hand and a parameter of Gießprazesses on the other hand is determined and the target value for the Setting parameter is determined from the context.
    [2]
    2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that as an association, a assignment of a time parameter to the measured course or a derived from the measured course size and an assignment of the time parameter is used to the parameter of the casting process.
    [3]
    3. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that an association of the parameter of the casting process to the measured course or a variable derived from the measured course is used as the context,
    [4]
    4. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, characterized in that a threshold value or a target value for the measured course or a derived from the measured course size is specified and the context of the threshold or the target value corresponding value of the parameter of the casting process determined and determined as the setpoint for the setting parameter.
    [5]
    5. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, characterized in that a value of the parameter of the casting process, which corresponds to an extreme value of the measured course or derived from the measured course Great, determined via the context and is determined as a desired value for the adjustment parameters ,
    [6]
    6. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 5, characterized in that exactly one casting cycle, is filled in the casting material in the mold cavity (4) is performed.
    [7]
    7. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 5, characterized in that a plurality of casting cycles, in which casting material in the mold cavity (4) is filled, are performed, wherein the parameter of the casting process is varied in the various casting cycles.
    [8]
    8. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 7, characterized in that a setpoint value for a switching point between a velocity and a pressure-controlled phase of Einsprit2bewegung is determined as an adjustment parameter, wherein a screw position is used as a parameter.
    [9]
    9. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 8, characterized in that a desired value for a sealing point and / or an end time of an injection movement is determined as a setting parameter, wherein a holding pressure time is used as a parameter.
    [10]
    10. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 9, characterized in that a desired value for a holding time is determined as a setting parameter, wherein a time parameter is used as a parameter.
    [11]
    11. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 10, characterized in that a setpoint for a Kühizeit is determined as a setting parameter, wherein a time parameter is used as a parameter.
    [12]
    12. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 11, characterized in that a desired value for an injection pressure limit is determined as a setting parameter, wherein the injection pressure is used as a parameter.
    [13]
    13. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 12, characterized in that a target value for a closing force is determined as a setting parameter, wherein a momentary closing force is used as a parameter.
    [14]
    14. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 13, characterized in that an injection speed of an injection movement is used as a setting parameter and as a parameter.
    [15]
    15. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 14, characterized in that a cooling time for a molded part to be produced is used as a setting parameter and as a parameter.
    [16]
    16. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 15, characterized in that a cylinder temperature of an injection cylinder is used as a setting parameter and as a parameter.
    [17]
    17. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 16, characterized in that a tool temperature is used as a setting parameter and as a parameter.
    [18]
    18. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 17, characterized in that a dynamic pressure is used as a setting parameter and as a parameter.
    [19]
    19. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 18, characterized in that a screw speed is used as a setting parameter and as a parameter.
    [20]
    20. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 19, characterized in that at least one hot runner temperature is used as a setting parameter and as a parameter.
    [21]
    21. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 20, characterized in that a closing force is used as a setting parameter and as a parameter.
    [22]
    22. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 21, characterized in that a switching point between a speed and a pressure-controlled phase of an injection movement is used as a setting parameter and as a parameter.
    [23]
    23. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 22, characterized in that a holding pressure level is used as a setting parameter and as a parameter.
    [24]
    24. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 23, characterized in that a holding time is used as a setting parameter and as a parameter.
    [25]
    25. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 24, characterized in that an injection pressure limit is used as adjustment parameters and as parameters.
    [26]
    26. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 25, characterized in that the desired value for the adjustment parameter is used in the control or control of a shaping machine.
    [27]
    27. Forming machine with - a closing unit (2) for exerting a closing force on two mold cavities (4) forming mold halves, - an injection unit (3) for filling the mold cavity (4) with a casting material, - a measuring device (8,10,11 , 12, 13) for measuring at least one characteristic of a variable characteristic of the closing force, characterized in that a control device (7) connected to the measuring device is provided, which is designed to establish a relationship between the measured course or one from the measured course on the other hand, to determine a derived quantity on the one hand and a parameter of the casting process on the other hand, and to determine a desired value for the setting parameter from the context. Innsbruck, September 30, 2013
    类似技术:
    公开号 | 公开日 | 专利标题
    DE102014014231A1|2015-04-02|Method for determining a setpoint for a setting parameter
    EP3055116B1|2017-09-20|Method for controlling a mold filling process of an injection-molding machine
    EP2583811B1|2015-03-11|Method for quantifying process fluctuations in the injection process of a injection moulding machine
    DE102015114845B4|2020-07-02|Method and device for injection molding plastic materials
    DE102015000219B4|2019-11-14|Mold clamping force adjusting device and method for an injection molding machine
    EP3359365B1|2019-08-14|Method for determining an actual volume of an injection-mouldable compound in an injection-moulding process
    DE102016002521B4|2020-10-01|Pressure control device for an injection molding machine
    DE102004051109B4|2007-01-18|Method for operating an injection molding machine
    DE102016001039A1|2016-08-18|Method for operating an injection unit and injection unit
    DE102005037116B3|2007-01-18|Forming a molded part from liquid material, e.g. for use injection molding or casting, involves the application of pressure to induce solidification of the melt
    EP3157727B1|2018-08-15|Method for operating an injection-moulding machine
    AT518422A4|2017-10-15|Storage container for a molding machine
    EP3546179B1|2021-01-13|Method for reproducing an injection molded part quality in injection molding and injection molding unit for performing said method
    AT514836B1|2015-06-15|Method for determining a sealing point
    DE102007029977B4|2009-09-24|Method for carrying out the closing force reduction in a closing unit of an injection molding machine
    AT501951B1|2008-12-15|METHOD FOR INJECTION MOLDING OF PLASTIC PARTS
    EP0699514A2|1996-03-06|Computer supported process to determine the optimum working point of an injection molding machine
    DE102017000239B4|2020-06-18|Method for determining the position of an introduction point of a driving force or a closing force in a mold clamping unit, method for producing a molded part by means of a mold clamping unit and mold clamping unit for a molding machine
    EP2485881B1|2013-12-11|Method for controlling the production of a product
    AT11350U1|2010-09-15|METHOD FOR PRODUCING A LONG FORM PART
    DE2145010A1|1973-03-22|METHOD OF INJECTING PLASTICIZABLE MATERIAL INTO A FORM BY MEANS OF AN INJECTION CYLINDER, AND DEVICE FOR CARRYING OUT THE METHOD
    DE102009060665A1|2011-06-30|Method for controlling e.g. cavity pressure of product, to control production of product in injection molding machine, involves modifying shear rate and/or shear stress until product reaches desired quality
    同族专利:
    公开号 | 公开日
    DE102014014231A1|2015-04-02|
    CN104608351B|2020-10-16|
    CN104608351A|2015-05-13|
    AT514847B1|2015-06-15|
    引用文献:
    公开号 | 申请日 | 公开日 | 申请人 | 专利标题
    US4411609A|1980-04-18|1983-10-25|Hitachi, Ltd.|Apparatus for molding plastic|
    EP0947305A2|1998-03-16|1999-10-06|Husky Injection Molding Systems Ltd.|Injection mold clamp pressure optimization system and method|
    WO2002076704A1|2001-03-22|2002-10-03|Priamus System Technologies Ag|Method for regulating the contraction of molded parts|
    WO2010008287A1|2008-07-17|2010-01-21|Fico B.V.|Method for encapsulating electronic components with a controllable closing force|
    JP5059960B2|2011-03-15|2012-10-31|ファナック株式会社|Mold clamping force setting method and mold clamping force setting device for injection molding machine|
    JP2012250360A|2011-05-31|2012-12-20|Toshiba Mach Co Ltd|Molding machine, and injection control method|
    CN102338705B|2011-07-25|2014-01-29|上海戈冉泊精模科技股份有限公司|Mould testing method for precise injection mould|
    AT511391B1|2011-10-18|2013-02-15|Engel Austria Gmbh|METHOD FOR QUANTIFYING PROCESS FLUCTUATIONS IN AN INJECTION OPERATION OF AN INJECTION MOLDING MACHINE|AT521442B1|2018-07-12|2021-07-15|Engel Austria Gmbh|Dynamic adjustment of the clamping force|
    AT521726A1|2018-10-03|2020-04-15|Engel Austria Gmbh|Method for determining a physical relationship|
    AT523126A1|2019-10-15|2021-05-15|Engel Austria Gmbh|Procedure for defining a setpoint curve|
    AT523127A1|2019-10-15|2021-05-15|Engel Austria Gmbh|Method for determining real molding compound fronts and for comparing simulations|
    CN110920010B|2019-10-29|2021-10-19|上海澎睿智能科技有限公司|Injection molding process production method based on big data analysis|
    法律状态:
    优先权:
    申请号 | 申请日 | 专利标题
    ATA757/2013A|AT514847B1|2013-09-30|2013-09-30|Method for determining a setpoint for a setting parameter|ATA757/2013A| AT514847B1|2013-09-30|2013-09-30|Method for determining a setpoint for a setting parameter|
    DE201410014231| DE102014014231A1|2013-09-30|2014-09-26|Method for determining a setpoint for a setting parameter|
    CN201410756238.7A| CN104608351B|2013-09-30|2014-09-29|Method and molding machine for determining a setpoint value for a control variable|
    [返回顶部]